beauty

shower

The Truth about Skin Cleansing

Personal hygiene and skin cleansing have been an essential part of human culture for centuries. However, with the ever-evolving beauty and skincare industry, there is a myriad of opinions on the best way to clean and maintain healthy skin. Questions such as whether we really need to cleanse our skin, how often we should do it, and what products to use remain a matter of hot debate. In this article we seek to uncover the truth about soap and skin cleansing, answering the most common questions by reviewing both scientific data and expert advice. Do You Really Have to Cleanse Your Skin? Cleansing is a fundamental part of skincare – face and body. Your skin is your body’s largest organ, and it plays a crucial role in protecting you from external pollutants, bacteria, and irritants. Throughout the day, your skin accumulates dirt, dead skin cells, bacteria, and oils, which can clog pores and lead to conditions like acne, eczema, or dermatitis. Cleansing helps remove these impurities and allows your skin to breathe and function optimally (1). However, there is a difference between cleansing for necessary hygiene and over-cleansing, which may strip the skin of its natural oils and lead to irritation or dryness. Dermatologists suggest that individuals with oily or acne-prone skin may need more frequent cleansing, whereas those with dry or sensitive skin should limit the use of harsh cleansers to avoid damaging the skin’s natural moisture barrier (2). Thus, while the consensus is that cleansing is essential, the type of skin you have, your environment and your lifestyle should dictate how often and with what you cleanse. How Often Should You Cleanse Your Skin? How often you should cleanse your skin depends largely on your lifestyle, skin type, and personal hygiene preferences. For example, those living in urban areas where air pollution is high might need to cleanse their skin more frequently than those in rural settings (3). Although in rural settings there might be more dust, which could also warrant more regular cleansing. Additionally, individuals who exercise regularly or spend time in environments that expose them to dirt or sweat should cleanse their skin more often than those with sedentary lifestyles. The general recommendation from dermatologists is to wash your face twice a day – once in the morning to remove oils accumulated overnight and once at night to clear the day’s dirt and pollutants (4). For the rest of the body, daily or near-daily washing is often recommended, particularly after activities like working out or heavy sweating. However, for individuals with dry or sensitive skin, limiting showering to every other day may prevent stripping the skin of its natural oils (5). The truth is that a study from Harvard Health suggests that cleansing your skin daily isn’t strictly necessary for everyone, and in some cases, frequent washing can actually lead to skin issues such as dryness, itching, and eczema (6). They advocate for a more measured approach to cleansing, focusing on key areas like underarms, groin, and feet, rather than full-body washing each day. What Should You Use to Cleanse Your Skin? The type of cleanser you use matters. There is an ongoing debate between using bar soap versus body washes. Bar soaps, particularly those labeled as “antibacterial,” have been shown to be effective in removing bacteria and dirt. However, some bar soaps can be harsh and drying to the skin, as they may contain ingredients that strip away the skin’s natural oils (7). Body washes, on the other hand, tend to be more hydrating and are often infused with moisturizing agents like glycerin or shea butter, making them a better choice for those with dry or sensitive skin. For facial skin, which tends to be more delicate, using a cleanser that is gentle and suited to your skin type is important. Dermatologists recommend avoiding products with harsh sulfates, alcohols, or fragrances that can irritate the skin or lead to breakouts (8). Instead, opt for mild, non-comedogenic cleansers that support your skin’s natural barrier. Is Castile Soap Good for Cleansing the Skin? Castile soap has gained popularity as a natural, eco-friendly alternative to conventional cleansers. Made primarily from vegetable oils like olive or coconut oil, Castile soap is often praised for being gentle, biodegradable, and free from harsh chemicals (9). But is it good for cleansing the skin? Positives of Castile Soap: Negatives of Castile Soap: In summary, Castile soap can be a good option for those looking for a natural, eco-friendly cleanser, but it’s important to dilute it properly and monitor how your skin reacts, especially if it’s on the sensitive side. Bathing vs. Showering: Pros and Cons Bathing and showering are two of the most common methods of body cleansing, but which is better for your skin? Both have their advantages and disadvantages, and the choice often comes down to personal preference, skin type, and specific skincare goals. Pros of Showering: Cons of Showering: Pros of Bathing: Cons of Bathing: Conclusion Cleansing the skin is essential for maintaining skin health and preventing conditions like acne or irritation. However, the frequency and method of cleansing should be tailored to individual skin types, environmental factors, and lifestyle habits. The truth is that while daily skin cleansing may not be necessary for everyone, regular washing of the face and body, particularly after sweating or exposure to pollutants, remains important. Castile soap offers a natural and eco-friendly option for those looking to avoid harsh chemicals, but its alkaline nature may not be suitable for everyone. Lastly, when choosing between bathing and showering, consider your skin type, time, and personal hygiene needs to find what works best for you. Our Recommendation Our Shower gel and Baby Body Wash is made with pure castile soap, gently diluted with distilled water. Always moisturize after using any kind of soap. References

The Truth about Skin Cleansing Read More »

The truth about Baby Skin

Baby skin is truly a wonder of nature! It is delicate, soft, and (mostly) fragrant, yet it is also highly sensitive and vulnerable. It is often a source of joy for parents, but it also requires diligent care and attention. Baby skin works differently than adult skin, owing to its structure and function, and it is particularly susceptible to environmental factors, infections, and irritants. In this article, we will explore the truth about how baby skin functions, why it is so sensitive, and how to protect it effectively. How Baby Skin Works Baby skin undergoes rapid development and adaptation after birth. While it appears smooth and flawless, the structure of infant skin is quite different from adult skin. Being the biggest organ and the protective layer, it is a crucial part of the baby’s defense system, but it is still developing and functions less effectively than mature skin. Skin Structure and Function The skin is composed of three primary layers: the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue. In infants, each layer has unique characteristics that impact its function. The Role of the Skin Barrier The primary role of the skin is to act as a barrier against harmful external elements. The truth is, for newborns and infants, this barrier is still developing, and it continues to mature during the first year. An underdeveloped skin barrier means that water retention is weak, contributing to dryness. Furthermore, baby skin can absorb topical agents more rapidly, leading to a higher risk of irritation and systemic effects from substances applied to it (4). Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL) is significantly higher in infants than adults, which means babies lose more moisture through their skin, making hydration critical (5), both through oral intake (drinking fluids) and topical application (creams). Additionally, a baby’s skin microbiome—the community of beneficial bacteria on the skin surface that helps fight off pathogens—takes time to develop, leaving infants more vulnerable to infections (6). What Does Baby Skin Look Like? Baby skin is often described as flawless, but the truth is, it is not always as perfect as it seems. Several conditions are common in newborns due to their immature skin and its developing functions. Common Characteristics of Baby Skin Why Is Baby Skin So Sensitive? Baby skin sensitivity stems from its underdeveloped structure and function, which limits its ability to defend against external aggressors. Several factors contribute to this sensitivity: Protecting Baby’s Skin Given the sensitive nature of baby skin, it is important to adopt gentle care practices that provide protection while allowing the skin to develop naturally. There are a lot of noise about how to care properly for your baby’s skin, and there are so many products available, each one seeming more important than the next. But the truth is that baby skin doesn’t need so many different products for it to develop and grow strong. Here are some strategies to protect baby skin effectively: 1. Moisturization Since baby skin loses moisture rapidly, it is crucial to use moisturizing products that lock in hydration. Opt for fragrance-free, colorant-free, hypoallergenic lotions or creams formulated for sensitive skin. Ingredients like shea butter, glycerin, and ceramides can help support the skin’s barrier function (5). Always be wary of products containing SLS or SLES, as this is a known skin irritant. Moisturizers should be applied right after bathing, when the skin is still damp, to help seal in moisture. Regular use of emollients can also help reduce the risk of conditions like eczema (2). Read this article for more information on the treatment of eczema. 2. Gentle Bathing Frequent bathing can strip away the natural oils that help protect the skin, so it is recommended to bathe babies only two to three times a week. Use lukewarm water and mild, soap-free cleansers to avoid drying out the skin. Be sure to avoid hot water, as it can exacerbate skin dryness (4). After bathing, pat the skin dry rather than rubbing, which can cause irritation. Focus on gently cleaning areas like the diaper region, neck folds, and behind the ears (7). 3. Clothing and Diapers Dressing babies in soft, breathable fabrics like cotton can reduce the risk of irritation. Avoid fabrics like wool or synthetic materials that can cause friction and lead to rashes. Keep clothing loose to allow air circulation and prevent overheating (5). When it comes to diapers, frequent changes are essential to prevent diaper rash. Diaper rash occurs when moisture, urine, and feces irritate the delicate skin. Using barrier creams containing zinc oxide can create a protective layer on the skin to prevent diaper rash (6). 4. Sun Protection Baby skin is especially sensitive to the sun, and direct sunlight should be avoided as much as possible, especially in babies younger than six months. Use protective clothing, wide-brimmed hats, and seek shade when outdoors. If sun exposure is unavoidable, use broad-spectrum sunscreen with a minimum SPF of 30, formulated for infants (1). 5. Minimize Use of Harsh Products Babies do not need perfumes, dyes, or harsh chemicals on their skin. Opt for products labeled “fragrance-free” and “hypoallergenic” to reduce the risk of irritation. Similarly, avoid laundry detergents with fragrances or additives that can linger on clothes and irritate baby skin (2, 4). Although the use of fabric softeners are taken for granted, consider eliminating using it at all. By simply adding bicarbonate of soda to the wash, the smells are removed and replaced with a natural clean smell, but without the additives and irritants generally found in fabric softeners. 6. Watch for Signs of Irritation Even with the best care, baby skin may (and probably will!) still react to new products or environmental changes. Look for redness, dryness, bumps, or rashes as signs of irritation. If a rash develops, remove any potential irritants, and consult a pediatrician if the condition worsens or persists (6). Conclusion The truth is that baby skin, while beautiful and soft, requires careful attention and care due to its unique structure and function. It is thinner, more permeable,

The truth about Baby Skin Read More »

Our scars and ourselves

How Scars Affect How We Feel About Ourselves Scars are not just physical marks on the skin; they carry deep emotional, psychological, and social implications that can profoundly affect how individuals perceive themselves and how they are perceived by others. The impact of scars on self-esteem and overall mental well-being is multifaceted, involving a complex interplay between visibility, personal history, and societal reactions. The Physical Nature of Scars Scars form as part of the body’s natural healing process when the deep layer of skin, known as the dermis, is damaged. The body produces new collagen fibers to mend the injury, but these fibers are aligned differently from the surrounding skin, resulting in a distinct texture and appearance. While scars are primarily viewed as superficial skin changes, they can also affect underlying tissues, potentially restricting movement or causing chronic discomfort​. We wrote 2 articles about stretch marks, which is also scarring of the skin. In those articles we explain how the skin that forms from scarring, is different to normal skin and that that is why scars and stretch marks can be lightened and even shrunk, but it is very seldom that it goes away completely. Psychological Impact of Visible Scars The visibility of a scar plays a crucial role in its psychological impact. Scars located on highly visible areas, such as the face, neck, or hands, tend to be more distressing, because you can’t hide it. These scars can become a focal point in social interactions, leading to heightened self-consciousness and a persistent awareness of the scar in public settings. Individuals with visible scars often report feelings of embarrassment, anxiety, or even shame, particularly if they believe that others are judging them based on their appearance​. Scars can also be constant reminders of traumatic events, such as accidents or surgeries, which can trigger emotional distress. For some, these scars symbolize survival and resilience, while for others, they are a source of emotional pain and a reminder of vulnerability. This duality in perception can significantly influence an individual’s mental health, sometimes leading to conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)​. Societal Reactions and Self-Perception The social aspect of scarring cannot be overlooked. Society often associates physical appearance with personal value, and deviations from perceived norms can lead to stigmatization. Visible scars may attract unwanted attention, questions, or pity, which can be uncomfortable for the individual. Over time, these social interactions can shape how a person perceives themselves, often internalizing negative feelings and reducing their self-esteem​. Moreover, scars can impact social functioning, making individuals more self-conscious in social settings, leading to withdrawal or avoidance behaviors. This can interfere with personal relationships, professional opportunities, and overall quality of life. In some cases, people with scars might engage in coping mechanisms such as covering up their scars or avoiding situations where their scars might be noticed, further reinforcing a negative self-image​. The Role of Medical and Cosmetic Interventions Given the significant impact of scars on self-esteem, many individuals seek medical or cosmetic interventions to minimize their appearance. Procedures such as scar revision surgery, laser treatments, and fillers can help reduce the prominence of scars, thereby improving an individual’s confidence and comfort in social situations. However, the decision to undergo such procedures is deeply personal and often influenced by the psychological burden of living with a visible scar​. The Neurological and Cognitive Dimensions of Scarring Scars can also have neurological implications, especially when associated with chronic pain. The brain’s response to scarring is complex, involving a feedback loop where physical pain and discomfort can affect cognitive functions like focus, memory, and emotional regulation. This ongoing interaction between the scarred area and the brain can lead to persistent pain or discomfort, which in turn, can exacerbate feelings of frustration, anxiety, or depression​. Furthermore, the brain’s ability to adapt to physical changes caused by scars—such as restricted movement—highlights the resilience of the human body. However, this adaptation process can sometimes lead to new challenges, such as posture imbalances or chronic pain syndromes, which further affect an individual’s quality of life and mental health. Conclusion Scars, while often seen as mere physical marks, have far-reaching implications for an individual’s psychological and social well-being. The visibility of scars, the personal and societal reactions they evoke, and the neurological challenges they present all contribute to how a person feels about themselves. Understanding and addressing the emotional impact of scars is crucial in helping individuals navigate their experiences and maintain a positive self-image, whether through acceptance, medical intervention, or psychological support. References: https://verybigbrain.com/body-brain-connection/the-brains-perspective-on-scars-how-past-injuries-can-impact-present-thinking/ https://www.entofathens.com/the-emotional-impact-of-visible-scars/

Our scars and ourselves Read More »

Article 2000s

Beauty ideals over the decades: 2000’s

The biggest change of the 21st century was the sexualization. Women were encouraged to be independent, youthful, though, sexually liberated and ambitious fashionistas (e.g. “sex and the city”). The media was filled with virgin teen-stars, starring as the hottest sex symbols, or children of famous becoming “it girls” after an “accidental” scandal of some kind. Reality-TV became a thing, and you could now be famous for being famous, which again started a whole new level of fame obsession. (As I mentioned in my previous post) The modern society is very loud, so one has to scream even louder for attention (e.g. Lady Gaga is to modern society what Madonna was to the 80’s). The reaction was television shows, movies and music videos that seemed more like soft porn, and stage outfits that looked more like lingerie. What before had been an ideal of cool, sweet or wholesome role-models was quickly traded in for a rebellious “bombshell” look. Many turned to silicon, fake tan, and hair extensions to acquire that “flawless diva look” (which could also be described as a form of “peacocking”).  Starting the new millennia with a shiny and metallic revival of the 60’s futuristic style, we continued into the 2000’s with the glam factor as high as ever. The new retro revival was the neon colored 80’s and the psychedelic, hippie, glamorous, 70’s. Bling was everywhere, fur was “classy”, earrings were big, the skin was supposed to be glowing, eyeshadow and lipgloss was shimmering. Popular clothing was either cropped, cut-out, short or scooped, or in other cases just very close fitting and revealing. Do you remember the sexy pimp look, the sexy gipsy or the sexy kick-ass heroine? Sexy was the look, in almost every look.Natural (“mousy”) hair-colors were perceived as plain, and the most popular choices was blond, dark brown/black, and a range of red to purple. To spice up the hair even further, highlights, lowlights, wavy and layered hairstyles were very popular. In the mid 2000s artist’s such as Beyonce and Jennifer Lopez became celebrated for their healthy curves. Their “mixed” look made it easier to appeal equally to several groups of ethnicity, because more people were able to identify with them (I like to call this, “the exotic trend”). The light wanted to be dark and the dark wanted to be light, and it looked a bit like: Blue eyes, dark hair and tan skin vs. brown eyes, light hair and tan skin. The trend at it’s peek, resulted in what I prefer to call the “fake” look, and the term “tanorexia” was born (someone who is addicted to tanning).  At the turn of the century, the typical cover/spokesmodel was exchanged for actresses and pop stars. Everyone wanted to be a Victorias secret supermodel, or at least look like one, and by 2007 eating disorders was at it’s peak in Hollywood. In fact, from the year 1999 to 2010, the death of famous people suffering from anorexia was as great, as the sum of anorexia deaths (of famous people) in the rest of the 20th century alone. The media frenzy began with a growing number of underweight models and some cast members of the hit Tv-show, “Ally McBeal”. Later the torch was passed on to Lindsay Lohan, Keira Knightley, Nicole Richie, Kate Bosworth, Tara Reid, and so on…Many blamed fashion or the media in general, and the “Rachel Zoe style” was considered as a connection between the desire to be thin as a look.  In the early 2000s the silhouette was very slender to curvy-skinny. The body should appear firm, chesty or just plain super slender, but (no pun intended) very soon bootylicious was on the rise and the fuller hourglass followed. The online experiments of the University of Regensburg had divided the modern ideal (last updated 2007) into four typical looks and suggested that there were different ideal types depending on the observer.  1. the average women’s figure with “standard measures” (The girl next door, Britney Spears and Jennifer Aniston)2. classical 90-60-90-Type, with an hourglass figure  (The curvy temptress, Beyonce, Salma Hayek)3. the sportive type: masculine, tight pelvis, but big breasts  (Serena Williams and other athletic women)4. the “Barbie type”: thin, big breasts, tight pelvis, long legs  (The supermodel barbie, Angelina Jolie, Tyra Banks). This time with flaws and all, created the foundation for the body ideal and trend interpretation we have today. The line between equalization and objectification had never before been so blurred, and was the first real awakening of how damaging an unrealistic body image could be.  ICONS OF THE 21st CenturyBeyonce, Britney Spears, Heidi Klum, Salma Hayek, Tyra Banks, Christina Aguilera, Kate Moss, Calista Flockhart, Jennifer Lopez, Victoria Beckham, Keira Knightley, Nicole Kidman, Adriana Lima, Gisele Bundchen, Snookit, Paris Hilton,  Jessica Alba, Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, Jennifer Aniston, Lindsay Lohan, Nicole Richie, Angelina Jolie and Lucy Liu.

Beauty ideals over the decades: 2000’s Read More »

Article 1990s 2

Beauty ideals over the decades: 1990’s

The 1990’s was the beginning of the rejection of fashion. This lead to the popularization of the “Casual chic” look, including t-shirts, jeans, hoodies and trainers, which we still have today. Street wear was in and couture was on it’s way out. The modern woman was a working woman who needed to dress in a more practical and efficient way. She was also supposedly equal to the man, and at this point women and men dressing in a similar style had become a regular thing (Both dressing as men, that is..). Fashion had more to do with the expression of a personal style than the old fashioned “proper” way to dress like a lady or a gentleman. The effect became a wider range of styles to choose from, and an understanding that fashion was a way to signalize who you were, on a deeper level. The silhouette was minimalistic, straight, oversized or boxy. You could have a messy and casual grunge look, be punk, hippie or goth, be a clean modern preppy, smart casual, or business casual, be a playful or classy minimalist, have a colorful and oversized hip hop style, or just wear flashy fashion statements. Depending on what group you belonged to, “the choice was yours”. All of the 90’s featured many styles never publicly accepted before, and definitely added a new twist to the ideal of beauty with it’s anti-fashion mix and match clothing, silly hats, platform shoes, as well as the start of the tattoo and piercing trend (You no longer had to be a rocker type to have one). But, the biggest change of the 90’s was probably the new acceptance of the edgy or quirky look as a fashion style. With the help of iconic anti-heroes in television, film, and the fashion icons embracing this look, being a “misfit” quickly turned into “cool individualist”. This change opened the door to a more relaxed and playful form of beauty and a new type of woman. In the beauty department, makeup and hair trends dictated that the skin should appear matte and flawless, eyebrows defined or super thin, noses very narrow and small, “sucked in” cheeks was hot, body glitter and bedazzling was cool, and lips were supposed to be full with a deep red lipstick or frosted with a pencil outline. The Rachel haircut became a big hit throughout the entire 90’s and then some. Other popular hairstyles were slightly odd, messy, crimped, straight or just plain natural, and both men and women started to cut their hair short.  The 1990’s had two main beauty ideals. On one side there was the glamazon super model, such as Elle Macpherson, Cindy Crawford and Naomi Campbell, with their athletic, but curvaceous figures. On the other side there was Kate Moss who marked the beginning of the ‘waif’ look (A physical presence of youth and extreme thinness; a fashion style featuring this look), and started a revolution not only in modeling but also consumer fashion. Off the runway the ideal could be divided it into four accepted looks. 1. The thin, straight figure (Brick and Column), 2. The athletic (Cornet), 3. The chesty but slender (lollipop and goblet), and 4. The slimmer fit version of the classic hourglass (hourglass and vase). At this time it was still considered to be a sign of overweight to have a large bottom or thick thighs in the western society, and the pear-shape was a negative word. Larger women were basically never cast as the “hot girl” which sent the message, “only skinny girls are beautiful” (Although, plus size modeling was already a profession).  The 90’s was really big on skinny, short skirts, cropped tops, bellybutton piercings, the braless look, and large knockers, so the pressure to having perfect boobs, slender long legs, a flat tummy and abs was huge. It did not take long before the plastic surgery and dieting trend eventually started to blossom, and the pressure kept rising all the way into the new millennia.  ICONS OF THE 90sSuper models Kate Moss, Naomi Campbell, Cristie Turlington, Linda Evangelista, Cindy Crawford, Claudia Schiffer, Eva Herzigova, Nadja Auermann, Carla Bruni, Tatiana Sorokko, Helena Christensen, Yasmeen Ghauri, Stephanie Seymour, Carolyn Murphy, Amber Valetta, Shalom Harlow, Tyra Banks, Jennifer Anniston, Pamela Anderson, Catherine Zeta Jones, Meryl Streep, Julia Roberts, Angelina Jolie, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Princess Diana, Bjørk, Michelle Pfeifer, Katie Holmes, Christina Appelgate, Shannon Doherty, Juliana Marguiles, Neve Campbell, Gillian Anderson, Keri Russel, Teri Hatcher, Jenna Elfman, Sarah Jessica Parker, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Calista Flockhart, Kellie Martin, Melissa Joan Hart, Tiffani Amber Thiessen, Courtney Thorne-Smith, Lisa Bonet, Courtney Cox, Jennie Garth and Heather Locklear. http://idealiststyle.weebly.com/1/post/2014/01/beauty-ideal-over-the-decades-part-4-the-90s

Beauty ideals over the decades: 1990’s Read More »

Shopping Basket